Question: In some countries, criminal trials are shown on television so the general public can watch the theme. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Answer 1
Criminal trials are shown on television so the general public can watch, raising red flags about whether it is in the broader public interest...
There are few arguments in favor of relaying judicial litigation, ranging from educating the masses to preventing mistrials...
On the other hand, multi-faceted complications validate the banning of cameras in courtrooms. Firstly, highlighting any lawsuit invades the privacy of various stakeholders: the supposed perpetrator, the aggrieved party, judges, jury, witnesses, attorneys, and prosecutors...
Secondly, behavioral psychologists say that the behavior of jurors, lawyers, eyewitnesses, or criminals can be swayed by media pressure to act a certain way, thereby influencing verdicts...
Additionally, not to forget, children are part of the television audience, and teenagers, in particular, have a propensity towards gaining fame...
In conclusion, while keeping in mind that the repercussions of real-time trials' transmission exceed the benefits, the justification of a prohibitory court order is valid...