Academic Discussion Sample Answer
Academic Discussion Title: Does Denuclearization Create Greater Security Risks
Keywords or Topics: international relation, military
The samples about "Does denuclearization create greater security risks" are handy resources for students to enrich their writing skills of academic discussion.
Besides, more academic discussion questions sharing the same topic are linked to help students understand the different requirements and target the assignments precisely. The current academic discussion has two topics: international relation and military. So, academic discussion questions about them are listed separately.
Keywords or Topics: international relation, military
The samples about "Does denuclearization create greater security risks" are handy resources for students to enrich their writing skills of academic discussion.
Besides, more academic discussion questions sharing the same topic are linked to help students understand the different requirements and target the assignments precisely. The current academic discussion has two topics: international relation and military. So, academic discussion questions about them are listed separately.
| Actions & New Examples |
Is World Cup expansion motivated by commercial interests Does some governments accept illegal economic activity Are new technologies changing the warfare Should US hold a military parade for 250th anniversary Should influencers face accountability for misinformation Is AI the main cause of higher youth unemployment Should governments allow AI to handle medical cases Will AI permanently reduce job opportunities Replace employees after using their skill to train AI AI and robots negatively affect consumer markets High oil prices help the development of clean energy Should nuclear energy be treated as a clean energy Are wind and solar power genuinely clean energy sources Use environmental ethics to limit energy development Is hydropower a harmful energy source in the long term Should others oppose U.S. return to the moon Should governments restrict space-based services Should space exploration become more profit-oriented Should we contact extraterrestrial civilizations Would extraterrestrials be more civilized than us Is justice more important than peace Should the WHO determine the origins of viruses Could nuclear proliferation contribute to world peace Should US reduce its troop presence in global hotspots Does denuclearization create greater security risks Should governments control excessive tourism| Academic Discussion questions and samples |
Question:
The professor is teaching a class on international security and nuclear policy. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.
In your response, you should:
Professor:Today, we’ll discuss the risks and benefits of nuclear disarmament. Some experts argue that giving up nuclear weapons can create serious security risks for countries because nuclear deterrence may discourage foreign invasion or military pressure. They often point to Ukraine, which inherited nuclear weapons after the collapse of the Soviet Union but later agreed to give them up. Some people believe that if Ukraine had retained nuclear weapons, the large-scale war that began in 2022 might have been less likely to occur. Others argue that allowing more countries to keep nuclear weapons would increase global instability and make nuclear conflict more dangerous overall. What do you think? Does denuclearization create greater security risks for countries? Why or why not?
Sophia:I believe denuclearization can create serious security risks. Nuclear weapons act as a deterrent because other countries are less likely to attack a nation capable of causing massive retaliation. The example of Ukraine suggests that security guarantees from other countries may not always be enough to prevent conflict. For this reason, some governments may feel safer maintaining nuclear deterrence.
Brian:In my opinion, encouraging countries to keep nuclear weapons is extremely dangerous. While nuclear deterrence may prevent some conflicts, the spread of nuclear weapons increases the chances of accidents, miscalculations, and arms races. Long-term global security depends on reducing nuclear arsenals and strengthening international cooperation, not expanding nuclear deterrence.
In your response, you should:
- Express and support your opinion.
- Contribute to the discussion in your own words.
Professor:Today, we’ll discuss the risks and benefits of nuclear disarmament. Some experts argue that giving up nuclear weapons can create serious security risks for countries because nuclear deterrence may discourage foreign invasion or military pressure. They often point to Ukraine, which inherited nuclear weapons after the collapse of the Soviet Union but later agreed to give them up. Some people believe that if Ukraine had retained nuclear weapons, the large-scale war that began in 2022 might have been less likely to occur. Others argue that allowing more countries to keep nuclear weapons would increase global instability and make nuclear conflict more dangerous overall. What do you think? Does denuclearization create greater security risks for countries? Why or why not?
Sophia:I believe denuclearization can create serious security risks. Nuclear weapons act as a deterrent because other countries are less likely to attack a nation capable of causing massive retaliation. The example of Ukraine suggests that security guarantees from other countries may not always be enough to prevent conflict. For this reason, some governments may feel safer maintaining nuclear deterrence.
Brian:In my opinion, encouraging countries to keep nuclear weapons is extremely dangerous. While nuclear deterrence may prevent some conflicts, the spread of nuclear weapons increases the chances of accidents, miscalculations, and arms races. Long-term global security depends on reducing nuclear arsenals and strengthening international cooperation, not expanding nuclear deterrence.
Answer 1
I agree with Sophia that denuclearization may create significant security risks for some countries. Nuclear weapons can discourage military aggression because potential attackers know the consequences of war could become catastrophic. In international politics, security guarantees and diplomatic ...
Score: 90%
......
Answer 2
I support Brian’s opinion that the world becomes more dangerous when countries rely heavily on nuclear weapons for security. While nuclear deterrence may reduce the risk of direct invasion in some situations, it also encourages arms races and increases international tension. If more countries ...
Score: 90%
......
Academic Discussion Questions for Topic : international relation
Samples
Academic Discussion Questions for Topic : military
Samples